In Brown-Spaulding Assoc. v. Intl. Surplus Lines, 206 Cal.App.3d 1441, 254 Cal.Rptr. 192 (1988), the California court struck down a "claims made" policy that required both first and third-party claims to be reported during the policy period.
Summary of this case from Wolf Bros. Oil v. Intern. Surplus Lines1989.
In Brown-Spaulding Assoc. v. Intl. Surplus Lines, 206 Cal.App.3d 1441, 254 Cal.Rptr. 192 (1988), the California court struck down a "claims made" policy that required both first and third-party claims to be reported during the policy period.
Summary of this case from Wolf Bros. Oil v. Intern. Surplus LinesIn Brown-Spaulding Assocs. v. Int'l Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 206 Cal.App.3d 1441, 254 Cal.Rptr. 192 (1988), the California Court of Appeal considered a reporting requirement in a claims made policy.
Summary of this case from Burns v. International Ins. Co.Full title:Brown-Spaulding Associates, Inc. v. International Surplus Lines Ins. Co. …
Court:Court of Appeal of California
Date published: Dec 21, 1989
Therefore, extrinsic evidence again suggests that the parties in the instant case were not bargaining ex ante…
Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. SarrisThe Sarris defendants contend that even though "tail" coverage was not purchased in this case, this kind of…