From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown-Ross Shoe Co. v. Abney

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 21, 1925
104 So. 288 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

8 Div. 157.

April 21, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marshall County; Leon McCord, Judge.

Suit on account by the Brown-Ross Shoe Company against W.H. Abney. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Street Bradford, of Guntersville, for appellant.

H.G. Bailey, of Boaz, for appellee.


This appeal is from a judgment in favor of appellee (defendant) in a suit on account brought by appellant (plaintiff) in the circuit court of Marshall county. The appellant assigns but a single ground of error — the overruling by the trial court of its motion for a new trial.

Under the familiar rule laid down in Cobb v. Malone Collins, 92 Ala. 630, 9 So. 738, which rule, substantially unchanged, yet prevails in this state, we cannot say that the court committed error in the particular claimed. The evidence made an issue fairly for the jury, which was submitted under full, accurate, and clear instructions by the judge trying the case.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Brown-Ross Shoe Co. v. Abney

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 21, 1925
104 So. 288 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Brown-Ross Shoe Co. v. Abney

Case Details

Full title:BROWN-ROSS SHOE CO. v. ABNEY

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 21, 1925

Citations

104 So. 288 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
104 So. 288

Citing Cases

National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Saffold

The verdict of the jury was in accord with the evidence, and the motion for a new trial was properly…

National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. Moore

Metropolitan L. I. Co. v. Carter, 212 Ala. 212, 102 So. 130. The verdict of the jury was in accord with the…