From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown-Hill v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 29, 2022
No. 10712-21S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 29, 2022)

Opinion

10712-21S

03-29-2022

Lincoya Brown-Hill Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND DECISION

Ronald L. Buch Judge

On March 2, 2022, the Commissioner filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution and the Court set this motion for hearing at the trial session of the Court scheduled to commence on March 28, 2022, in San Antonio, Texas.

This case was called from the calendar for hearing on the Commissioner's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution at the trial session of the Court at San Antonio, Texas on March 28, 2022. There was no appearance by or on behalf of petitioner. Counsel for the Commissioner appeared and was heard. After due consideration, and for cause more fully appearing in the transcript of the proceeding, it is

ORDERED that the Commissioner's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution filed March 2, 2022, is granted and this case is dismissed for lack of prosecution. It is further

ORDERED AND DECIDED that there is a deficiency in income tax due from petitioner for the taxable year 2019 in the amount of $2, 500.00. 1


Summaries of

Brown-Hill v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Mar 29, 2022
No. 10712-21S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Brown-Hill v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Lincoya Brown-Hill Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Mar 29, 2022

Citations

No. 10712-21S (U.S.T.C. Mar. 29, 2022)