From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brown Crummer Investment Co. v. City of Burbank

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 24, 1938
97 F.2d 993 (9th Cir. 1938)

Opinion

No. 8754.

June 24, 1938.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California, Central Division; Paul J. McCormick, Judge.

Dismissing appeal, D.C., 17 F. Supp. 469.

Martin Huguenin and James G. Martin, all of Wichita, Kan., and Roscoe R. Hess, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Ralph W. Swagler, City Atty., of Burbank, Cal., and Wm. Mackenzie Brown and Leon Thomas David, Sp. Counsel, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees Burbank et al.

E.C. Pyle, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees Hammond et al.

Before GARRECHT, STEPHENS, and HEALY, Circuit Judges.


Upon stipulation of counsel for the respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed, that a decree of dismissal be filed and entered accordingly, and that the mandate of this court issue forthwith.


Summaries of

Brown Crummer Investment Co. v. City of Burbank

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 24, 1938
97 F.2d 993 (9th Cir. 1938)
Case details for

Brown Crummer Investment Co. v. City of Burbank

Case Details

Full title:BROWN CRUMMER INVESTMENT COMPANY v. CITY OF BURBANK et al

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 24, 1938

Citations

97 F.2d 993 (9th Cir. 1938)