Brown Brown, Inc. v. Cola

Full title: BROWN BROWN, INC., BROWN BROWN OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. and GRINSPEC, INC…

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 23, 2011

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3898 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-3898.

March 23, 2011

ORDER

RONALD BUCKWALTER, District Judge

AND NOW, this 23^rd day of March, 2011, upon consideration of (1) Defendant Ryan Tola's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 60), the Response of Plaintiffs Brown Brown, Inc., Brown Brown of Pennsylvania, Inc., and Grinspec, Inc. (collectively "Plaintiffs") (Docket No. 75), Defendant Tola's Reply Brief (Docket No. 83), and Plaintiffs' Sur-reply Brief (Docket No. 91); and (2) Defendant Robert Cola's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 79) and Plaintiffs' Response (Docket No. 88), it is hereby ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED as follows:

1. Defendant Tola's request to dismiss the Lanham Act, and Defendant Cola's joinder in that request, are DENIED;

2. The remainder of both Defendant Tola's Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant Cola's Motion for Summary Judgment are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to re-filing upon the close of discovery.

It is so ORDERED.