noting that courts review “the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and draw all inferences in that party's favor”
Summary of this case from Cherewick v. State Farm Fire & Cas.No. 19-1067.
10-05-2020
Neal N. BROWDER, et al., Petitioners, v. S.R. NEHAD, et al.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied.
noting that courts review “the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and draw all inferences in that party's favor”
Summary of this case from Cherewick v. State Farm Fire & Cas.noting that courts review "the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and draw all inferences in that party's favor"
Summary of this case from United States v. GoldsmithFull title:Neal N. BROWDER, et al., Petitioners, v. S.R. NEHAD, et al.
Court:Supreme Court of the United States.
Date published: Oct 5, 2020
For purposes of ruling on Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, the Court liberally construes all…
Totton v. City of SacramentoIn determining whether an officer's actions were objectively reasonable, the Court “must balance the nature…