Opinion
2:22-cv-01082-JLR
03-21-2023
GORDON BROWARD and SHAADI NEZAMI, individually and as representatives of a class of similarly situated persons, on behalf of the MICROSOFT CORPORATION SAVINGS PLUS 401K PLAN, Plaintiffs, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MICROSOFT CORPORATION; THE 401K ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE MICROSOFT CORPORATION SAVINGS PLUS 401 K PLAN; and DOES NO. 1-20, Whose Names Are Currently Unknown, Defendants.
TERRELL MARSHALL LAW GROUP PLLC Beth E. Terrell, WSBA #26759 Beth E. Terrell, WSBA #26759 James E. Miller Laurie Rubinow MILLER SHAH LLP James C. Shah Alec J. Berin MILLER SHAH LLP Kolin C. Tang MILLER SHAH LLP 19712 MacArthur Blvd. Irvine, California Attorneys for Plaintiffs, the Plan and the Proposed Class MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Molly A. Terwilliger Molly A. Terwilliger, WSBA #28449 Jeremy P. Blumenfeld, PA Bar # 85955 Sean K. McMahan, DC Bar # 1008732 Mayra Negrete, CA Bar # 333491 Attorneys for Defendants Microsoft Corporation, The Board of Trustees of Microsoft Corporation, and The 401(k) Administrative Committee of the Microsoft Corporation Savings Plus 401(k) Plan
TERRELL MARSHALL LAW GROUP PLLC Beth E. Terrell, WSBA #26759 Beth E. Terrell, WSBA #26759 James E. Miller Laurie Rubinow MILLER SHAH LLP James C. Shah Alec J. Berin MILLER SHAH LLP Kolin C. Tang MILLER SHAH LLP 19712 MacArthur Blvd. Irvine, California Attorneys for Plaintiffs, the Plan and the Proposed Class
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP Molly A. Terwilliger Molly A. Terwilliger, WSBA #28449 Jeremy P. Blumenfeld, PA Bar # 85955 Sean K. McMahan, DC Bar # 1008732 Mayra Negrete, CA Bar # 333491 Attorneys for Defendants Microsoft Corporation, The Board of Trustees of Microsoft Corporation, and The 401(k) Administrative Committee of the Microsoft Corporation Savings Plus 401(k) Plan
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED AGREED ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Honorable James L. Robart United States District Judge
STIPULATION
The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and jointly request that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 61) be re-noted to April 7, 2023, that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file an opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint be March 27, 2023, and that the deadline for Defendants' reply in support of their motion to dismiss be extended to April 7, 2023.
ORDER
Based on the foregoing stipulation of the parties, the Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint is re-noted to April 7, 2023, that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file an opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint be March 27, 2023, and that Defendants' reply in support of their motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' amended complaint shall be filed on or before April 7, 2023.