From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broussard v. Warden, South Louisiana Corr. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION SECTION P
Jul 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-cv-1757 (W.D. La. Jul. 27, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-cv-1757

07-27-2012

MARTIN PAUL BROUSSARD LA. DOC #114817 v. WARDEN, SOUTH LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL CENTER


JUDGE JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN KAY


JUDGMENT

There being no objection to the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, these findings and conclusions are accepted. Alternatively, this court concludes that the proposed findings and conclusions are entirely correct. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED THAT the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE because petitioner's claims are barred by the one-year limitation period codified at 28 U.S.C. §2244(d).

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in chambers, Lake Charles, Louisiana, on this 27th day of July, 2012.

_________________________

JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Broussard v. Warden, South Louisiana Corr. Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION SECTION P
Jul 27, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-cv-1757 (W.D. La. Jul. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Broussard v. Warden, South Louisiana Corr. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:MARTIN PAUL BROUSSARD LA. DOC #114817 v. WARDEN, SOUTH LOUISIANA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION SECTION P

Date published: Jul 27, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:11-cv-1757 (W.D. La. Jul. 27, 2012)