Broussard v. State

Full title: DANIEL KEITH BROUSSARD, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Jul 8, 2004

No. 09-04-085 CR (Tex. App. Jul. 8, 2004)

Opinion

No. 09-04-085 CR

Opinion Delivered July 8, 2004. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3, Jefferson County, Texas, Trial Cause No. 235976. Appeal Dismissed.

Before McKEITHEN, C.J., BURGESS and GAULTNEY, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION¹

1 Tex.R.App.P. 47.4.

PER CURIAM

On May 20, 2004, we notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless arrangements were made for filing the record or the appellant explained why he needed time for filing the record. The appellant notified the trial court clerk that the appellant did not desire to pursue the appeal. It appears that the appellant is not entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex.R.App.P. 20.2. There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the record, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex.R.App.P. 37.3(b).