From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broughton v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 10, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1720 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1720 DFL GGH P.

August 10, 2006


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The petitioner has not filed an in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee.

The application attacks a conviction issued by the Los Angeles County Superior Court. While both this Court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in Los Angeles County. Id. at 499 n. 15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California, 312 N. Spring Street, Rm. G-8, Los Angeles, CA 90012.


Summaries of

Broughton v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 10, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1720 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2006)
Case details for

Broughton v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:KENDALL BROUGHTON, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 10, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1720 DFL GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 10, 2006)