From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broughton v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 12, 2014
2014-3063 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 12, 2014)

Opinion

2014-3063

03-12-2014

DARLENE M. BROUGHTON, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF-0752-13-0101-I-1.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The Department of the Veterans Affairs ("Department") moves to reform the official caption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board") as the proper respondent, and to set the due date for the Board's brief as 21 days from the date of disposition of this motion.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Broughton's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motions to reform the caption are granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.

(2) The Board should calculate its brief due date from the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

__________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court
s21


Summaries of

Broughton v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 12, 2014
2014-3063 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 12, 2014)
Case details for

Broughton v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:DARLENE M. BROUGHTON, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 12, 2014

Citations

2014-3063 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 12, 2014)