From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brotman v. Traiman

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 19, 1925
127 A. 700 (N.J. 1925)

Opinion

Argued October 22, 1924 —

Decided February 19, 1925.

For the appellant, Leroy W. Loder.

For the respondent, Herbert C. Bartlett.


The judges being equally divided on the question whether the judgment should be reversed, the judgment is affirmed solely because of such division, which renders any opinion by the court impossible.

This was an action in the Supreme Court to recover on a broker's commission for the sale of real estate. The case was tried at the Cumberland Circuit before Judge Schimpf and a jury. The trial judge directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and defendant appeals to this court.


The judgment under review herein is affirmed by an equally divided court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, JJ. 7.

For reversal — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, MINTURN, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, CLARK, KAYS, JJ. 7.


Summaries of

Brotman v. Traiman

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 19, 1925
127 A. 700 (N.J. 1925)
Case details for

Brotman v. Traiman

Case Details

Full title:HERMAN BROTMAN, RESPONDENT, v. LOUIS TRAIMAN, APPELLANT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 19, 1925

Citations

127 A. 700 (N.J. 1925)
127 A. 700