From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brother Records v. Elliott

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 1, 2008
276 F. App'x 613 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 06-56401.

Submitted February 8, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed May 1, 2008.

Edwin F. McPherson, Esq., McPherson and Kalmansohn, David B. Parker, Esq., Michael K. Zweig, Esq., Parker Mills Morin, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Philip H. Stillman, Flynn Stillman, Cardiff, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Kenneth A. Feinswog, Esq., Kenneth A. Feinswog Law Offices, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant.

Allen Hyman, Esq., Law Offices of Allen Hyman, North Hollywood, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Consuelo B. Marshall, Chief District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-00-13314-CBM.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, O'SCANNLAIN, and W. FLETCHEK, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


In light of this court's decision in Morgan v. Wilson, Nos. 06-55825, 06-55841, 2008 WL 1924943, we vacate and remand for recalculation of attorneys fees.


Summaries of

Brother Records v. Elliott

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 1, 2008
276 F. App'x 613 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Brother Records v. Elliott

Case Details

Full title:BROTHER RECORDS, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 1, 2008

Citations

276 F. App'x 613 (9th Cir. 2008)