From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brophy v. Brophy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 30, 1999
259 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

March 30, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Sherry Klein Heitler, J.).


Plaintiff made a prima facie showing that she was entitled to contingent alimony, and therefore arrears. Defendant's submission of an affirmation from his attorney in opposition to the motion was insufficient to defeat summary judgment (Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562-563).

Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Lerner, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Brophy v. Brophy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 30, 1999
259 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Brophy v. Brophy

Case Details

Full title:GEMMA BROPHY, Individually and as Mother and Guardian of ANDREW BROPHY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 30, 1999

Citations

259 A.D.2d 443 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
688 N.Y.S.2d 133

Citing Cases

Barracks v. Metro N. Commuter R.R.

MTA is one of the indemnified parties in the prime contract. MTA has failed to prove, through any evidence,…