Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Broome v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Com'n

921 So. 2d 334 (Miss. 2006)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Broome v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Com'n

20 Citing cases

  1. City of Grenada v. Miss. Dep't of Emp't Sec.

    320 So. 3d 523 (Miss. 2021)   Cited 4 times

    This Court has also said that the underlying purpose of Mississippi's employment security law "is to protect those workers not permitted to continue employment through no fault of their own." Broome v. Miss. Emp. Sec. Comm'n , 921 So. 2d 334, 337 (Miss. 2006) (internal quotation mark omitted) (quoting Allen v. Miss. Emp. Sec. Comm'n , 639 So. 2d 904, 906 (Miss. 1994) ).

  2. Alexander v. Mississippi Dept

    998 So. 2d 419 (Miss. 2008)   Cited 3 times

    1992)).Broome v. Miss. Employment Sec. Comm'n, 921 So.2d 334, 337 (Miss. 2006). ¶ 16.

  3. Seago v. Miss. Dep't of Emp't Sec.

    158 So. 3d 392 (Miss. Ct. App. 2015)   Cited 1 times

    Miss.Code Ann. § 71–5–531 (Rev.2011). “[W]here there is substantial evidence, this Court has no authority to reverse the circuit court's affirmance” of the Board's decision. Broome v. MESC, 921 So.2d 334, 337 (¶ 12) (Miss.2006) (quoting Richardson v. MESC, 593 So.2d 31, 34 (Miss.1992)). Since the Board's factual findings are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence and are without fraud, we will not “reweigh the facts of the case or insert [our] judgment for that of the agency.”

  4. Hemphill v. Miss. Dep't of Emp't Sec.

    152 So. 3d 1226 (Miss. Ct. App. 2014)

    Miss.Code Ann. § 71–5–531 (Rev. 2011). “[W]here there is substantial evidence, this Court has no authority to reverse the circuit court's affirmance of the decision of the Board of Review.” Broome v. MESC, 921 So.2d 334, 337 (¶ 12) (Miss.2006) (quoting Richardson v. MESC, 593 So.2d 31, 34 (Miss.1992)). “The [B]oard's findings of fact are conclusive if supported by substantial evidence and without fraud.

  5. Hemphill v. Miss. Dep't of Emp't Sec.

    NO. 2014-CC-00515-COA (Miss. Ct. App. Mar. 20, 2014)

    "[W]here there is substantial evidence, this Court has no authority to reverse the circuit court's affirmance of the decision of the Board of Review." Broome v. MESC, 921 So. 2d 334, 337 (¶12) (Miss. 2006) (quoting Richardson v. MESC, 593 So. 2d 31, 34 (Miss. 1992)).

  6. Seago v. Miss. Dep't of Emp't Sec.

    NO. 2013-CC-01843-COA (Miss. Ct. App. Sep. 24, 2013)

    Miss. Code Ann. § 71-5-531 (Rev. 2011). "[W]here there is substantial evidence, this Court has no authority to reverse the circuit court's affirmance" of the Board's decision. Broome v. MESC, 921 So. 2d 334, 337 (¶12) (Miss. 2006) (quoting Richardson v. MESC, 593 So. 2d 31, 34 (Miss. 1992)).

  7. Henry v. Mississippi Department of Employment Security

    962 So. 2d 94 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007)   Cited 4 times

    Therefore, this Court must not reweigh the facts of the case or insert its judgment for that of the agency. Broome v. Miss. Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 921 So.2d 334, 337 (¶ 12) (Miss. 2006) (internal citations and quotations omitted). ¶ 19.

  8. Jones v. Miss. Emp't Sec. Comm'n

    181 So. 3d 1001 (Miss. 2016)   Cited 2 times

    Mississippi Emp't Sec. Comm'n v. Fortenberry, 193 So.2d 142, 143 (Miss.1966).See Broome v. Mississippi Emp't Sec. Comm'n, 921 So.2d 334, 337 (Miss.2006) ; Johnson v. Mississippi Emp't Sec. Comm'n, 761 So.2d 861, 863 (Miss.2000) ; Huckabee v. Mississippi Emp't Sec. Comm'n, 735 So.2d 390, 394 (Miss.

  9. Sherman v. Mississippi

    989 So. 2d 398 (Miss. 2008)   Cited 2 times
    Finding good cause for leaving job due to refusal to price gouge after Hurricane Katrina

    "The underlying purpose of implementing employment security law in Mississippi is to protect those workers not permitted to continue employment through no fault of their own." Broome v. Miss. Employment Sec. Comm'n, 921 So.2d 334, 337 (Miss. 2006) (quoting Allen v. Miss. Employment Sec. Comm'n, 639 So.2d 904, 906 (Miss. 1994)).

  10. Jones v. Miss. Dep't of Emp't Sec.

    318 So. 3d 497 (Miss. Ct. App. 2021)

    Id . Furthermore, our supreme court has stated that "where there is the required substantial evidence, this Court has no authority to reverse the circuit court's affirmance of the decision of the Board of Review." Broome v. Miss. Emp't Sec. Comm'n , 921 So. 2d 334, 337 (¶12) (Miss. 2006). Therefore, this Court will not disturb the denial of unemployment benefits unless the decision is "(1) unsupported by substantial evidence, (2) arbitrary or capricious, (3) beyond the scope of power granted to the agency, or (4) in violation of the employee's constitutional rights."