From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Broom v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jul 29, 2008
258 S.W.3d 73 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. WD 68194.

June 24, 2008. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied July 29, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Thomas C. Clark, Judge.

Ruth Sanders, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Jamie P. Rasmussen, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before PAUL M. SPINDEN, Presiding Judge, JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge and JOSEPH M. ELLIS, Judge.

Prior Report: 173 S.W.3d 681.


ORDER


Mark E. Broom appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value, but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Broom v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Jul 29, 2008
258 S.W.3d 73 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Broom v. State

Case Details

Full title:Mark E. BROOM, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Jul 29, 2008

Citations

258 S.W.3d 73 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)