From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Vance

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2016
144 A.D.3d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

11-10-2016

In re Calvin BROOKS, Petitioner, v. Cyrus R. VANCE, Jr., etc., et al., Respondents.

Calvin Brooks, petitioner pro se. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michael J. Siudzinski of counsel), for Ellen Biben, respondent.


Calvin Brooks, petitioner pro se.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., respondent.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Michael J. Siudzinski of counsel), for Ellen Biben, respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.TOM, J.P., SWEENY, RICHTER, MANZANET–DANIELS, WEBBER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brooks v. Vance

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 10, 2016
144 A.D.3d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Brooks v. Vance

Case Details

Full title:In re Calvin BROOKS, Petitioner, v. Cyrus R. VANCE, Jr., etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 10, 2016

Citations

144 A.D.3d 477 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
144 A.D.3d 477
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 7414