From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Steberger

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 18, 2024
Civil Action 23-CV-4535 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 18, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 23-CV-4535

12-18-2024

CORRY M. BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. CHERYL STEBERGER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

John R. Padova, J.

AND NOW, this 18th day of December, 2024, upon consideration of Defendant Cheryl Steberger's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22), and Plaintiff Corry M. Brooks's failure to comply with the Court's Orders directing him to file a Response thereto (ECF Nos. 24, 29) and to the Court's October 21, 2024 Order directing him to show cause as to why his claims should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute (ECF No. 31), it is ORDERED that:

1. For the reasons stated in the Court's accompanying Memorandum applying the factors announced in Poulis v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co., 747 F.2d 863 (3d Cir. 1984), the Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 21) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE due to Brooks's failure to prosecute this case.

2. Defendant Steberger's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22) is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Brooks v. Steberger

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 18, 2024
Civil Action 23-CV-4535 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 18, 2024)
Case details for

Brooks v. Steberger

Case Details

Full title:CORRY M. BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. CHERYL STEBERGER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 18, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 23-CV-4535 (E.D. Pa. Dec. 18, 2024)