From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 27, 1925
272 S.W. 1115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

No. 8970.

Delivered May 27, 1925.

Burglary — Evidence Held Sufficient.

This record is before us without any bills of exception or brief upon the part of appellant, and finding no error the judgment is affirmed.

Appeal from the District Court of Palo Pinto County. Tried below before the Hon. J. B. Keith, Judge.

Appeal from a conviction of burglary; penalty, two years in the penitentiary.

The opinion states the case.

No brief filed by appellant.

Tom Garrard, State's Attorney, and Grover C. Morris, Assistant State's Attorney, for the State.


Appellant was indicted and convicted in the district court of Palo Pinto County for the offense of burglary and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without any bills of exception or brief upon the part of the Appellant.

After a careful examination of the record as presented to us, we fail to find any error disclosed therefrom and are of the opinion that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and it is accordingly so ordered.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.


Summaries of

Brooks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
May 27, 1925
272 S.W. 1115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Brooks v. State

Case Details

Full title:O. E. BROOKS v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: May 27, 1925

Citations

272 S.W. 1115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1925)
272 S.W. 1115