From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 7, 1925
103 So. 922 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)

Opinion

8 Div. 215.

April 7, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Limestone County; Osceola Kyle, Judge.

W.W. Malone, of Athens, for appellant.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State. Distilling.


There was sufficient evidence to make out a case for the state, and therefore the general charge as requested by defendant was properly refused. Charge 11 refused to defendant has misleading tendencies, and its refusal was not error. The rulings of the court upon the admissibility of testimony were free from error. We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.


Summaries of

Brooks v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 7, 1925
103 So. 922 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
Case details for

Brooks v. State

Case Details

Full title:Major BROOKS v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 7, 1925

Citations

103 So. 922 (Ala. Crim. App. 1925)
20 Ala. App. 673