From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 13, 2002
808 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 3D00-1976.

Opinion filed March 13, 2002.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Robert N. Scola, Judge. Lower Tribunal No. 3d00-4198.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Shaundra L. Kellam and Robert Godfrey, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Jill K. Traina, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, FLETCHER and SORONDO, JJ.


Andres Brooks appeals his conviction for attempted second degree murder. He contends that the trial court erred by failing to grant a continuance because he had received a black eye while in jail. He argued that if the jury were allowed to see him with a black eye, he would be unfairly prejudiced, as they would likely draw the inference that he had been in a fight and had a propensity for violence. The trial court denied the motion. The court offered to give the jury an explanation that the defendant had received the black eye in an accident. The defendant declined the offer of the special explanation.

We conclude that the trial court's ruling was within its discretion.See Mikenas v. State, 367 So.2d 606, 608 (Fla. 1978); Moten v. State, 391 So.2d 716 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Mar 13, 2002
808 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Brooks v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANDRES BROOKS, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Mar 13, 2002

Citations

808 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)