From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 30, 1975
50 A.D.2d 1035 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

December 30, 1975


The parties appealed to us from a judgment, entered January 3, 1973, upon a decision of the Court of Claims. We modified that judgment by excluding therefrom the sum of $9,500 awarded for consequential damages to the restaurant building ( 45 A.D.2d 900). The Court of Appeals has reversed the order entered upon our decision and remitted the case to us for a determination of consequential damages ( 37 N.Y.2d 849). Inasmuch as the State did not, either in its oral or written argument, specifically object to the allocation of consequential damages in the sum of $9,500 for the restaurant building as being improper or excessive and, since the Court of Appeals has found that an award of consequential damages for that building is warranted, we conclude that the judgment of the Court of Claims, entered January 3, 1973, should be in all respects affirmed. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P.J., Sweeney, Koreman, Main and Larkin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brooks v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 30, 1975
50 A.D.2d 1035 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Brooks v. State

Case Details

Full title:GRIFFIN A. BROOKS et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. STATE OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1975

Citations

50 A.D.2d 1035 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)