From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Shore

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 28, 2000
760 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Case No. 3D99-2500.

Opinion filed June 28, 2000.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Thomas S. Wilson, Jr., Judge, L.T. No. 95-21024.

Leslie Holland, for appellant.

Bedzow, Korn, Brown, Miller Zemel, P.A., and Robert B. Miller and Teri L. Di Giulian; Jason Bloch, Assistant County Attorney, for appellees.

Before JORGENSON, LEVY, and GREEN, JJ.


Affirmed. See Mendelsund v. Southern-Aire Coats of Florida, Inc., 210 So.2d 229, 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968) ("Generally, there is a presumption that an attorney, as an officer of the court, is duly authorized to act for a client whom he professes to represent. In the absence of some pleading questioning the attorney's acts . . ., the presumption is conclusive.").


Summaries of

Brooks v. Shore

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jun 28, 2000
760 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Brooks v. Shore

Case Details

Full title:VANREA J. BROOKS, Appellant, vs. SUZANNE SHORE, et al., Appellees

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jun 28, 2000

Citations

760 So. 2d 1093 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

Jensen v. Sierra Grill, Inc.

In the absence of some pleading questioning the attorney's acts . . ., the presumption is conclusive." Brooks…

Dixon v. Ross

But there is no such bar in this case, for the remedies are not inconsistent but merely cumulative, since…