From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 30, 2021
Case No. CV 20-03509-PSG (PD) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. CV 20-03509-PSG (PD)

03-30-2021

LEGEND BROOKS, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND ADOPTING, FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. The Court accepts the Magistrate Judge's Report and adopts it as its own findings and conclusions.

Further, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right or that the court erred in its procedural ruling and, therefore, a certificate of appealability will not issue in this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). DATED: March 30,, 2021.

/s/_________

PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brooks v. Madden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 30, 2021
Case No. CV 20-03509-PSG (PD) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2021)
Case details for

Brooks v. Madden

Case Details

Full title:LEGEND BROOKS, Petitioner, v. RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 30, 2021

Citations

Case No. CV 20-03509-PSG (PD) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2021)