From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Jun 13, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-82 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 13, 2016)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-82

06-13-2016

DEDRIC LAMONT BROOKS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN DALLAS B. JONES, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM ORDER OVERRULING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner Dedric Lamont Brooks, a prisoner confined at the Federal Correctional Institution in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge has submitted a Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The magistrate judge recommends dismissing the petition.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, along with the record, pleadings, and all available evidence. Petitioner filed objections to the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation.

The court has conducted a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b). After careful consideration, the court concludes the objections are without merit. Petitioner contends that the Fair Sentencing Act (FSA) of 2010 should be retroactively applied to decrease his mandatory minimum sentence from 10 years to 5 years of imprisonment. However, the FSA does not apply retroactively to defendants whose sentences were modified after the effective date of the FSA, but were originally sentenced before the effective date. United States v. Kelly, 716 F.3d 180, 181 (5th Cir. 2013).

ORDER

Accordingly, petitioner's objections (#4) are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct, and the report of the magistrate judge (#3) is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendation.

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 13th day of June, 2016.

/s/_________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brooks v. Jones

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Jun 13, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-82 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 13, 2016)
Case details for

Brooks v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:DEDRIC LAMONT BROOKS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN DALLAS B. JONES, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Jun 13, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-82 (E.D. Tex. Jun. 13, 2016)