From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. It Works Mktg.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 1, 2022
1:21-CV-1341-ADA-CBD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-CV-1341-ADA-CBD

11-01-2022

AILEEN BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. IT WORKS MARKETING INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

The parties have filed a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). (EFC No. 61.) Once a dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1) is properly filed, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal; the dismissal is effective automatically. See Com. Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1078 (9th Cir. 1999).

The Court finds that the parties' stipulation meets the requirements under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to close this case and to terminate the pending motions. (ECF Nos. 42, 43 and 54)

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brooks v. It Works Mktg.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 1, 2022
1:21-CV-1341-ADA-CBD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022)
Case details for

Brooks v. It Works Mktg.

Case Details

Full title:AILEEN BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. IT WORKS MARKETING INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 1, 2022

Citations

1:21-CV-1341-ADA-CBD (E.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022)