From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. GMAC Mortg.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 22, 2012
3:12-CV-1341-P-BK (N.D. Tex. Jul. 22, 2012)

Opinion

3:12-CV-1341-P-BK

07-22-2012

RICHARD W. BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. GMAC MORTGAGE, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and DENIES as moot Plaintiff's motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and to appoint counsel (Doc. 5, 6).

The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings and Recommendation, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brooks v. GMAC Mortg.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 22, 2012
3:12-CV-1341-P-BK (N.D. Tex. Jul. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Brooks v. GMAC Mortg.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD W. BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. GMAC MORTGAGE, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 22, 2012

Citations

3:12-CV-1341-P-BK (N.D. Tex. Jul. 22, 2012)