Brooks v. Exxum

Full title: SHANE BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR EXXUM, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Aug 8, 2023

3:21-cv-00506-RCJ-CSD (D. Nev. Aug. 8, 2023)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00506-RCJ-CSD

08-08-2023

SHANE BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. DOCTOR EXXUM, et al., Defendants.

AARON D. FORD Attorney General KEITH G. MUNRO Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC David J. Mortensen, Esq. Courtney Christopher, Esq Brittany A. Lewis, Esq Peccole Professional Park Attorneys for Defendants Michael Hanf, M.D., Wade Exxum, M.D.

ROBERT C. JONES UNITED STAGES DISTRICT JUDGE

AARON D. FORD Attorney General KEITH G. MUNRO Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants

HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, PLLC David J. Mortensen, Esq. Courtney Christopher, Esq Brittany A. Lewis, Esq Peccole Professional Park Attorneys for Defendants Michael Hanf, M.D., Wade Exxum, M.D.

ORDER STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

ROBERT C. JONES UNITED STAGES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Shane Brooks, and the Interested Party, the Nevada Department of Corrections, stipulate that the above-captioned action, and all parties and all related claims known and unknown, should be dismissed with prejudice by order of this Court, with each party to bear his own costs.

Shane Brooks

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED: