Brooks v. City of Uniontown

Full title: RUSSELL BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF UNIONTOWN, DONALD GMITTER, JONATHAN…

Court: United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 20, 2008

2:06cv810, Electronic Filing (W.D. Pa. Jun. 20, 2008)

Opinion

2:06cv810, Electronic Filing.

June 20, 2008

MEMORANDUM ORDER

DAVID CERCONE, District Judge

Plaintiff's Complaint was filed by the Clerk of Court on June 23, 2006, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Document No. 37) filed on May 28, 2008, recommended that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants (Document No. 27) be granted. Service was made on all counsel of record. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.1.4(B) of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges, that they had ten (10) days to file any objections. No objections have been filed. After review of the pleadings and the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered: AND NOW, this 20^th day of June, 2008;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 27) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Document No. 37) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated May 28, 2008, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.