From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. City of Seattle

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 30, 2010
623 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 08-035526.

September 30, 2010.

Eric L. Zubel, Esquire, Eric Zubel PC, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Ted Buck, Esquire, Karen Cobb, Stafford Frey Cooper, Seattle, WA, for Defendants-Appellants.

D.C. No. 2:06-cv-01681-RAJ.

Prior report: 599 F.3d 1018.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

Brooks v. City of Seattle

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 30, 2010
623 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Brooks v. City of Seattle

Case Details

Full title:Malaika BROOKS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF SEATTLE, Defendant, and…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 30, 2010

Citations

623 F.3d 911 (9th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

People v. White

) The People rely heavily on the decision in Brooks v. City of Seattle (9th Cir. 2010) 599 F.3d 1018, but the…

Cordeiro v. United States

Initially, to the extent the officers rely on the three-judge panel opinion, it has been overruled and "shall…