From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Carter

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Sep 18, 2012
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-442-TMH (M.D. Ala. Sep. 18, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-442-TMH

09-18-2012

DONALD FITZGERALD BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. JAMES A. CARTER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

The Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation (Doc. 20) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. After a review of the Recommendation, and after an independent review of the entire record, the court finds that the Recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Recommendation (Doc. 20) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for the failure of the plaintiff to comply with the orders of this court and his failure to properly prosecute this action.

A separate judgment shall issue.

_____________

TRUMAN M. HOBBS

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brooks v. Carter

DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION
Sep 18, 2012
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-442-TMH (M.D. Ala. Sep. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Brooks v. Carter

Case Details

Full title:DONALD FITZGERALD BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. JAMES A. CARTER, et al.…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 18, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-442-TMH (M.D. Ala. Sep. 18, 2012)