From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Brooks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

March, 1932.


Order denying plaintiff's motion to dismiss counterclaim in defendant's answer reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to the defendant to amend his answer by pleading the facts stated in the counterclaim as a defense, upon payment of ten dollars costs. The matters pleaded as a counterclaim may constitute a defense, but may not be pleaded as a counterclaim. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brooks v. Brooks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Brooks v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:GRACE BROOKS, Appellant, v. PHILLIP BROOKS, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1932

Citations

235 App. Div. 743 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)