From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Bostrom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 2005
18 A.D.3d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)

Opinion

2005-00887.

May 16, 2005.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated January 6, 2005, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Before: Cozier, J.P., Luciano, Crane and Skelos, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The location of the defendants' mail slot approximately 20 inches below that required by the United States Postal Service Domestic Mail Manual did not constitute a dangerous or defective condition on the defendants' premises. Thus, the defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law ( see Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562-563). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Zuckerman v. City of New York, supra).

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

Brooks v. Bostrom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 16, 2005
18 A.D.3d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
Case details for

Brooks v. Bostrom

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE J. BROOKS et al., Respondents, v. KEVIN BOSTROM et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 16, 2005

Citations

18 A.D.3d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)
795 N.Y.S.2d 618

Citing Cases

Ulrich v. Motor Parkway Properties

He testified that the angle of the slope was in accordance with OSHA guidelines. There was no call for…