From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Bank of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 30, 2012
3:11-CV-3270-N (BK) (N.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-CV-3270-N (BK)

03-30-2012

SUSAN BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, Defendant.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

The Court CERTIFIES that any appeal of this action would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). In support of this finding, the Court adopts and incorporates by reference the Magistrate Judge's Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 n.21 (5th Cir. 1997). Based on the Findings and Recommendation, the Court finds that any appeal of this action would present no legal point of arguable merit and would, therefore, be frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983).

______________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Brooks v. Bank of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Mar 30, 2012
3:11-CV-3270-N (BK) (N.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Brooks v. Bank of America

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Mar 30, 2012

Citations

3:11-CV-3270-N (BK) (N.D. Tex. Mar. 30, 2012)