From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jul 24, 1992
601 So. 2d 987 (Ala. 1992)

Opinion

1910685.

July 24, 1992.

Appeal from Washington Circuit Court, No. CV-91-089, J. Richmond Pearson, Judge.

Jesse James Brooks, pro se.

Joseph C. McCorquodale III and Jacqualyn M. Sheffield of McCorquodale and McCorquodale, Jackson, for appellee.


The plaintiff, Jesse James Brooks, appeals a summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Jack Bailey.

The plaintiff sought in the trial court to invoke the provisions of Ala. Code 1975, § 6-2-8, to suspend the operation of the statute of limitations on the claims brought against Bailey. Absent the applicability of § 6-2-8, Brooks's claims are time-barred.

Section 6-2-8, in pertinent part, permits the suspension of the operation of statutes of limitations where the plaintiff is "imprisoned on a criminal charge for any term less than life." By Brooks's own admission he is in prison for life. The provisions of § 6-2-8 do not apply in this case.

AFFIRMED.

HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES and HOUSTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brooks v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jul 24, 1992
601 So. 2d 987 (Ala. 1992)
Case details for

Brooks v. Bailey

Case Details

Full title:Jesse James BROOKS v. Jack BAILEY

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jul 24, 1992

Citations

601 So. 2d 987 (Ala. 1992)