From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. Austin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 2, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5773 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 2, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5773

11-02-2012

JAMES BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. C.O. AUSTIN, Defendant.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of November 2012, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Prosecute (Doc. No. 14) to which no response has been filed, and for the reasons stated in the Opinion filed this day, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and the Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE , J.


Summaries of

Brooks v. Austin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 2, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5773 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 2, 2012)
Case details for

Brooks v. Austin

Case Details

Full title:JAMES BROOKS, Plaintiff, v. C.O. AUSTIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 2, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5773 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 2, 2012)