From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks St. Assoc. v. Steinberg

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield
Oct 16, 1990
1990 Ct. Sup. 2635 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1990)

Opinion

No. CV87 0237974 S

October 16, 1990.


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


The plaintiffs have instituted this action against the defendants claiming they in another action slander the plaintiffs' title by filing lis pendens notices on property that was not part of the litigation. The factual basis is well put forth in plaintiffs' memorandum of law in opposition to the motion.

The defendants in this action, Connecticut Legal Services, Inc. and Russell T. Wolfgang Smith, have moved for summary judgment on the ground that they were absolutely privileged to file notices of lis pendens which cannot as a matter of law sustain a slander of title claim.

It is the opinion of the court that there remains an issue of material fact as to whether there was a probability that the premises would become a common interest community at the time the notices of lis pendens were filed. Accordingly, there is an issue of fact as to whether the defendants violated Connecticut General Statutes 52-325a by filing notices on property that was not the subject of the prior suit.

Defendants' motion for summary judgment is denied.

WILLIAM J. McGRATH, JUDGE


Summaries of

Brooks St. Assoc. v. Steinberg

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield
Oct 16, 1990
1990 Ct. Sup. 2635 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1990)
Case details for

Brooks St. Assoc. v. Steinberg

Case Details

Full title:BROOKS STREET ASSOCIATES, ET AL. v. CAROL STEINBERG, ET AL

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield

Date published: Oct 16, 1990

Citations

1990 Ct. Sup. 2635 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1990)

Citing Cases

In re Van Geuns

C. The board also held Van Geuns' remaining claims (claims 22-41 and 43-47) unpatentable because the…