From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks Alias Anderson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Jun 11, 1940
196 So. 687 (Fla. 1940)

Opinion

Opinion Filed June 11, 1940

A Writ of Error from the Circuit Court for Duval County, A.D. McNeill, Judge.

Nathan Schevitz, for Plaintiff in Error;

George Couper Gibbs, Attorney General, and William Fisher, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Defendant in Error.


In this cause Mr. Chief Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice BUFORD, and Mr. Justice BROWN are of the opinion that the decree in this cause should be reversed, while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice CHAPMAN, and Mr. Justice THOMAS are of the opinion that the said decree should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. 51, that the decree of the circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., WHITFIELD, BROWN, BUFORD, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

Brooks Alias Anderson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Jun 11, 1940
196 So. 687 (Fla. 1940)
Case details for

Brooks Alias Anderson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT BROOKS, alias ROBERT ANDERSON, alias FRANK ANDERSON, v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc

Date published: Jun 11, 1940

Citations

196 So. 687 (Fla. 1940)
196 So. 687