From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brookman v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 9, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 73478 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. CAF 16-00736 DOCKET NO. V-04440-14-15

05-09-2017

MATTER OF WILLIAM BROOKMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. SHARI ROGERS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT.


PRESENT:

An order having been entered on June 23, 2016, granting respondent's motion to respond to the appeal taken herein as a poor person and assigning Mary R. Humphrey, Esq., as counsel,

Now, upon reading and filing the statement of Mary R. Humphrey, Esq., dated March 27, 2017,

It is hereby ordered that William L. Koslosky, Esq., 2635 Genesee Street, Utica, New York 13501, is hereby substituted as counsel for respondent in the above-entitled appeal taken herein from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County, entered in the Office of the Clerk of said Court on April 5, 2016, in place and stead of Mary R. Humphrey, Esq., and may submit ten copies of respondent's brief reproduced in accordance with CPLR 5529.

Entered: May 9, 2017

FRANCES E. CAFARELL, Clerk


Summaries of

Brookman v. Rogers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
May 9, 2017
2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 73478 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

Brookman v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:MATTER OF WILLIAM BROOKMAN, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. SHARI ROGERS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date published: May 9, 2017

Citations

2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 73478 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)