From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooklyn Heights Railroad v. Brooklyn City Rail

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1913
154 App. Div. 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)

Opinion

January, 1913.


Motion to resettle order granted, by making the 2d paragraph thereof read as follows: "Unanimously ordered and adjudged, that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby unanimously affirmed, except as to the findings that Hollins Co. on the 14th day of February, 1903, were the owners of all of the capital stock of the plaintiff; that there had been a general examination of all of the accounts so as to make possible an accurate statement showing the respective indebtedness of the companies to each other; that interest should be awarded from September 1, 1894, amounting to $1,616,680.15; and that September 1, 1894, was the date prior to which $1,740,258.38 over and above expenditures for which the plaintiff had been reimbursed by the defendant, had been expended by the plaintiff; without costs to either party in this court." Jenks, P.J., Hirschberg, Burr, Woodward and Rich, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Brooklyn Heights Railroad v. Brooklyn City Rail

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1913
154 App. Div. 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Case details for

Brooklyn Heights Railroad v. Brooklyn City Rail

Case Details

Full title:The Brooklyn Heights Railroad Company, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn City…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1913

Citations

154 App. Div. 949 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)