From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brookins v. Renteria

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 17, 2022
1:21-cv-01809 JLT HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-01809 JLT HBK (PC)

06-17-2022

BARRY L. BROOKINS, Plaintiff, v. RENTERIA, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE

Barry L. Brookins is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se with this action. On May 2, 2022, the Court denied the application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee in full within 30 days. (Doc. 13.) The Court warned Plaintiff that “failure to pay the required filing fee as ordered will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice.” (Id. at 2, emphasis in original.) The 30-day period has expired, and Plaintiff failed to pay the $402 filing fee. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:

1. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brookins v. Renteria

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 17, 2022
1:21-cv-01809 JLT HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2022)
Case details for

Brookins v. Renteria

Case Details

Full title:BARRY L. BROOKINS, Plaintiff, v. RENTERIA, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 17, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-01809 JLT HBK (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 17, 2022)

Citing Cases

Brookins v. Martinez

Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp., 80 F.R.D. 626, 634 n. 1 (N.D. Cal. 1978). See also Brookins v. Renteria, No.…