From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brookins v. Pennsylvania Courts

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jan 10, 2012
No. 119 MM 2011 (Pa. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

No. 119 MM 2011

01-10-2012

JOHN DAVID BROOKINS, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA COURTS, AND DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, Respondents


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2012, the Application for Leave to File Original Process, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief, and the Petition for Permission to Reply are DISMISSED. Commonwealth v. Reid, 642 A.2d 453 (Pa. 1994) (hybrid representation not permitted). The Prothonotary is directed to forward the filings to counsel of record.


Summaries of

Brookins v. Pennsylvania Courts

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Jan 10, 2012
No. 119 MM 2011 (Pa. Jan. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Brookins v. Pennsylvania Courts

Case Details

Full title:JOHN DAVID BROOKINS, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA COURTS, AND DEPT. OF…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

Citations

No. 119 MM 2011 (Pa. Jan. 10, 2012)