Opinion
July, 1910.
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except McLennan, P.J., and Kruse, J., who dissented upon the ground that the plaintiff's claim is not established by clear and convincing evidence.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Brookins v. Goodnow
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 1, 1910
140 App. Div. 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Summaries of
Brookins v. Goodnow
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 1, 1910
140 App. Div. 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)
Case details for
Brookins v. Goodnow
Case Details
Full title:Dora Brookins, Respondent, v. Lucius Titus Goodnow and Willis D. Newton…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Date published: Jul 1, 1910
Citations
140 App. Div. 883 (N.Y. App. Div. 1910)