From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooking v. McGinley

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 28, 2024
2:21-cv-02239-JDW (E.D. Pa. Jun. 28, 2024)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02239-JDW

06-28-2024

MARCUS BROOKING, Petitioner, v. SUPT. MCGINLEY, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

JOSHUA D. WOLSON, J.

AND NOW, this 28th day of June, 2024, upon consideration of Marcus Brooking's Motion For Leave To Proceed In Forma Pauperis, (ECF No. 1), it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED.

Upon consideration of Mr. Brooking's Petition For Relief From A Conviction Or Sentence By A Person In State Custody (ECF No. 2), the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable Judge Jose Arteaga (ECF No. 13), and Petitioner's Traverse For Writ Of Habeas Corpus (which I construe as an objection to Judge Artega's Report and Recommendation) (ECF No. 17), and for reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The objections set forth in Petitioner's Traverse For Writ Of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 17) are OVERRULED;

2. The Report & Recommendation (ECF No. 13) is ADOPTED; and

3. The Petition For Relief From A Conviction Or Sentence By A Person In State Custody (ECF No. 2) is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.


Summaries of

Brooking v. McGinley

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 28, 2024
2:21-cv-02239-JDW (E.D. Pa. Jun. 28, 2024)
Case details for

Brooking v. McGinley

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS BROOKING, Petitioner, v. SUPT. MCGINLEY, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 28, 2024

Citations

2:21-cv-02239-JDW (E.D. Pa. Jun. 28, 2024)