From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooke v. San Jose Harris Way Hotel LP

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 7, 2021
20-cv-09412-VKD (N.D. Cal. Jul. 7, 2021)

Opinion

20-cv-09412-VKD

07-07-2021

THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, v. SAN JOSE HARRIS WAY HOTEL LP, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL

VIRGINIA K. DEMARCHI UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff filed this action on December 29, 2020. There is no indication that defendant has been served with the complaint and summons. Additionally, pursuant to General Order No. 56 and the Court's scheduling order (Dkt. No. 4), plaintiffs notice of need for mediation should have been filed no later than June 11, 2021. No. such notice has been filed. Indeed, other than several clerk's notices filed by the Court, there has been little or no activity on this docket since plaintiff filed the complaint last December.

The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 (1962). By July 16, 2021, plaintiff shall file a statement in response to this order, showing cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brooke v. San Jose Harris Way Hotel LP

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 7, 2021
20-cv-09412-VKD (N.D. Cal. Jul. 7, 2021)
Case details for

Brooke v. San Jose Harris Way Hotel LP

Case Details

Full title:THERESA BROOKE, Plaintiff, v. SAN JOSE HARRIS WAY HOTEL LP, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 7, 2021

Citations

20-cv-09412-VKD (N.D. Cal. Jul. 7, 2021)