From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooke v. DHSM LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 6, 2024
8:24-00699 ADS (C.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2024)

Opinion

8:24-00699 ADS

06-06-2024

Theresa Brooke v. DHSM LLC, et al.


Present: The Honorable Autumn D. Spaeth, United States Magistrate Judge

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND OBEY COURT ORDER

On May 13, 2024, the Clerk?s office entered default against defendant DHSM LLC. (Dkt. No. 14.) The Court ordered Plaintiff Theresa Brooke to file an application for default judgment by no later than May 28, 2024. (Dkt. No. 16.) As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed an application for default judgment.

Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute and obey a court order. Plaintiff must file a written response by no later than June 12, 2024. Plaintiff may respond to this order by filing an application for default judgment.

Plaintiff is expressly warned that failure to timely file a response to this order may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute and obey a Court order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Brooke v. DHSM LLC

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jun 6, 2024
8:24-00699 ADS (C.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Brooke v. DHSM LLC

Case Details

Full title:Theresa Brooke v. DHSM LLC, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jun 6, 2024

Citations

8:24-00699 ADS (C.D. Cal. Jun. 6, 2024)