From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooke v. Cnty. of Rockland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 3, 2021
17 CIVIL 3166 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 3, 2021)

Opinion

17 CIVIL 3166 (PMH)

03-03-2021

FRANCIS BROOKE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF ROCKLAND, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order dated March 3, 2021, the Court GRANTS Defendants' motions for summary judgment dismissing Plaintiffs' First Amendment retaliation claim against the Defendants. The Court declines to exercise jurisdiction over the remaining claim of defamation against Heubeck and dismisses same without prejudice; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

March 3, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Brooke v. Cnty. of Rockland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 3, 2021
17 CIVIL 3166 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Brooke v. Cnty. of Rockland

Case Details

Full title:FRANCIS BROOKE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF ROCKLAND, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 3, 2021

Citations

17 CIVIL 3166 (PMH) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 3, 2021)