From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brook v. Sing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 25, 2012
No. CIV S-09-1364 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1364 GEB CKD P

01-25-2012

RONALD BROOK, Plaintiff, v. V. SING, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On January 17, 2012, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed January 10, 2012, denying plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed January 10, 2012, is affirmed.

____________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Brook v. Sing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 25, 2012
No. CIV S-09-1364 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2012)
Case details for

Brook v. Sing

Case Details

Full title:RONALD BROOK, Plaintiff, v. V. SING, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 25, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1364 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 25, 2012)