Brook v. Sing

Full title: RONALD BROOK, Plaintiff, V. SING, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 26, 2012

CIV S-09-1364 GEB CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2012)

Opinion

RONALD BROOK, Plaintiff, v. V. SING, et al., Defendants. No. CIV S-09-1364 GEB CKD P. United States District Court, E.D. California. January 26, 2012.

          ORDER

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge.

         On January 17, 2012, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed January 10, 2012, denying plaintiff's motion to amend his complaint. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

         Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed January 10, 2012, is affirmed.