Bronstad v. State

Full title: AMBER CHRISTINE BRONSTAD, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, Third District, Austin

Date published: Jun 21, 2006

Nos. 03-06-00318-CR, 03-06-00319-CR (Tex. App. Jun. 21, 2006)

Opinion

Nos. 03-06-00318-CR, 03-06-00319-CR

Filed: June 21, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appeal from the District Court of Travis County, 390th Judicial District, Nos. D-1-DC-05-205540 D-1-DC-05-302766, Honorable Julie H. Kocurek, Judge Presiding. Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction.

Before Chief Justice LAW, Justices PATTERSON and PEMBERTON.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

W. KENNETH LAW, Chief Justice.

Amber Christine Bronstad seeks to appeal the district court's orders continuing her on probation subject to amended conditions made following a hearing on the State's motions to revoke. The trial court has certified that this is a plea bargain case and Bronstad has no right of appeal. See Tex.R.App.P. 25.2(a)(2). More fundamentally, an order altering or modifying the conditions of probation is not appealable. Basaldua v. State, 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex.Crim.App. 1977). The appeal is dismissed.